home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: rcp6.elan.af.mil!rscernix!danpop
- From: danpop@mail.cern.ch (Dan Pop)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
- Subject: Re: FAQ list overspecificity (was: Very Simple <maths.h> problem...)
- Date: 4 Apr 96 19:50:50 GMT
- Organization: CERN European Lab for Particle Physics
- Message-ID: <danpop.828647450@rscernix>
- References: <4jf0c9$rs8@nic.umass.edu> <315B11FD.6460@oc.com> <DpAtJz.5z5@eskimo.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ues5.cern.ch
- X-Newsreader: NN version 6.5.0 #7 (NOV)
-
- In <DpAtJz.5z5@eskimo.com> scs@eskimo.com (Steve Summit) writes:
-
- >The upside of the question as it's currently worded is that it
- >appeals to the FAQ maintainer's sense of how the game ought to be
- >played. The downsides are that someone who knows he's not
- >"trying to do some simple trig," or who is searching mechanically
- >for the name of the one <math.h> routine he *is* having problems
- >with, may overlook question 14.3.
-
- People who grep the FAQ instead of reading it get exactly what they
- deserve.
-
- In this particular case, all that has to be read and not grepped
- is the table of contents for chapter 14. If the reader cannot realize
- that the answer to the question:
-
- 14.3: I keep getting "undefined: sin" compilation errors.
-
- may contain the solution to his "undefined: sqrt" problem, then maybe
- he would be better off choosing another career.
-
- >I *do* assume, and hope, that someone reading 14.3 can
- >extrapolate to other <math.h> functions. Perhaps I doth assume
- >too much. Comments?
-
- It is the right level of assumption, IMHO. To paraphrase the Murphy Law
- book: If you write a FAQ that even an idiot could understand, only idiots
- will want to read it :-)
-
- Keep the FAQ targeted at people with normal levels of intelligence.
-
- Dan (who pushed Steve to provide a table of contents for the FAQ :-)
- --
- Dan Pop
- CERN, CN Division
- Email: danpop@mail.cern.ch
- Mail: CERN - PPE, Bat. 31 R-004, CH-1211 Geneve 23, Switzerland
-